The first rule of Rolleiflex club is you don't talk about Rolleiflex club |
In an earlier essay on the LL a guest writer elucidated:
"While I was browsing Flickr and searching for some inspiration for my next portrait assignment, I came across some beautiful medium format portraits taken by excellent photographers using Hasselblad and Rolleiflex cameras. I was really impressed by the characteristics of those pictures: nicely balanced composition in square format, beautiful black and white (B&W) tones, shallow depth of focus and “mind blowing” micro-contrast details. As a digital shooter and owner of a Canon 5D mark2, it was something new to me that I have not seen before. Needless to say, I fell immediately love with medium format photography and I wanted to have a medium format camera to take pictures with similar characteristics".
Praise indeed! Especially from a writer on Mr Reichmann's LL blog which is not normally noted for espousing the advantages of film photography over full frame digital SLRs
My experience with Rolleiflex cameras goes back a few decades to the 1980's when I found myself training as a wedding operative.
The cameras have many great features and only a few drawbacks, the most obvious of which are the lack of truly close focus, the lack of interchangeable lenses and the laterally inverse (mirror) image on the focussing screen.
Rolleinar 1 on a Rolleiflex T |
As a young man I found using the Rolleiflex both inspirational and slightly frustrating, the top wedding guys all had Hasselblads and that was the camera I aspired to. It was only when I started using the 'Blad I started to appreciate the quiet handling and unobtrusive manner of the Rolleiflex, and in practical use interchangeable backs and lenses really didn't prove such a great advantage.
Perceived advantages
So what is the reason I preferred the Rollei to all other medium format cameras I've owned?
Top of the list is the way it handles, and from the waist and almost goes unnoticed during portrait shoots; you maintain eye contact whilst still being able to frame the subject–in other words there isn't a camera plastered in front of your face so the subject has a more relaxed less intrusive sitting.
Easier for Selfies? Would this be better with an SLR stuck to his face? |
Optical quality is also impressive, Zeiss and Schneider are two of the best lens producers in the world Tessar, Planar an Xenotar types are as good as it gets optically, and have drawn many iconic images over the years.
The master at work
|
Not all of us have the skill of Bailey, Avedon and Arbus or even Mr Reichmann but few will deny that quality tools are great to have and use–even if we don't aspire to being as cool as this guy:
How many digicam users look this cool? |
4 comments:
Have you tried the Old Standard, Mark? It's lighter, smaller and not as robust as the later models but they're possibly the most reliable of the lot and you'd be in good company with Doisneau and Capa. :) They're still fairly cheap as well. Great cameras one and all.
I have used a pre-war one a few years back, always fancied a Art Deco 'cord.
I guess I've owned a few post war ones early 50's Automat E&Fs I need some more as currently I'm just using an F and a T which I plan to take to Rome in a couple of months for some 1960's B&W stye photos
All I need is a little time....
The Art Deco is a lovely bit of kit, right enough. I once had a notion to try to collect one of every Rollei model but grew up before I could start down that road. :)
I have had about five (in 30 years) but I think we'll need scratch cards to get one of each, I do have a friend with a Tele Rollei possibly he'll swap it for a MacBook? :)
Post a Comment